

Glad that you graduated Saviour at the Internet Communities University of your bedroom.GAGAGO wrote:![]()
And my opinion is that Idiots are IDIOTS and that there is nothing to do about that. The Earth is full of them.
Who would have benefited if they had gone out of their way to make it harder to get gigs, harder to put an album out, harder to get publicity? What would be the purpose of such a destructive and senseless act?Later releases under the name Stratovarius are just using it for the sake of the trademark. Easier to get gigs, easier to get to put an album out, many things easier.
I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?AAAAAAAAAA wrote:If you think the current Stratovarius is not interesting or original, I unfortunately must respect your opinion...
Who would have benefited if they had gone out of their way to make it harder to get gigs, harder to put an album out, harder to get publicity? What would be the purpose of such a destructive and senseless act?Later releases under the name Stratovarius are just using it for the sake of the trademark. Easier to get gigs, easier to get to put an album out, many things easier.
Surely you don't believe they should throw away 25 years of work and start from scratch due to a relatively minor style change.
No one really complained that Stratovarius kept their name when Kotipelto joined. Its not a crime against humanity to keep your trademark.
Well, you wrote that they should split and that the current lineup is of "questionable morality". So crime against humanity was, you know, an embellishment to make a point.valo_666 wrote: I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?
Well, even if it isn't throwing away 25 years of work, it is still (by your own admission) making it harder to get gigs and release albums...look what happened to RR.I don't think that being honest to yourself and trying not to live from your past and step forward to other projects that don't involve such situations of questionable morality do not certainly mean that you throw away 25 years of work.
valo_666 wrote:Stratovarius is an absurdity with or without a new drummer, as long as they don't have Timo Tolkki in the coreIlsekena wrote:Dear Realistic Human Being, explain this to me like I'm a Complete Idiot because I don't get itvalo_666 wrote:Too much drummer for an already cadaveric band
By naming these options it's obvious that you agree with me that the use of Stratovarius name is based on the trademark advantages. Stratovarius should mean something more than a money making enterprise...AAAAAAAAAA wrote:Well, you wrote that they should split and that the current lineup is of "questionable morality". So crime against humanity was, you know, an embellishment to make a point.valo_666 wrote: I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?
Well, even if it isn't throwing away 25 years of work, it is still (by your own admission) making it harder to get gigs and release albums...look what happened to RR.I don't think that being honest to yourself and trying not to live from your past and step forward to other projects that don't involve such situations of questionable morality do not certainly mean that you throw away 25 years of work.
I'm curious why you think the current lineup is of "questionable morality" when they did not change the name. And give an explanation that I cannot use to argue that:
a) Apple should have changed their name when Steve Jobs passed away
b) Stratovarius should have changed their name when Lassila was fired
c) Hewlett-Packard should have changed their name when they stopped selling consumer devices
d) NASA should change their name when its Space Shuttle program was terminated in 2011
Of course I do, but do you think it is not normal to say in 2012 that you don't accept the new Stratovarius because TT is not in the band? And to say it is a cadaveric band? I mean, that is more like a 2008 thing. It is an anachronism.valo_666 wrote:I wrote in these forums because I joined pretty long before you and I loved the old days of Stratovarius. Aren't you ready to accept an opinion that doesn't agree with yours?... sigh...
THIS IS SHOWBUSINESS! And everyone who's involved in it, somehow is a part of that big "money making enterprise".valo_666 wrote:By naming these options it's obvious that you agree with me that the use of Stratovarius name is based on the trademark advantages. Stratovarius should mean something more than a money making enterprise...AAAAAAAAAA wrote:Well, you wrote that they should split and that the current lineup is of "questionable morality". So crime against humanity was, you know, an embellishment to make a point.valo_666 wrote: I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?
Well, even if it isn't throwing away 25 years of work, it is still (by your own admission) making it harder to get gigs and release albums...look what happened to RR.I don't think that being honest to yourself and trying not to live from your past and step forward to other projects that don't involve such situations of questionable morality do not certainly mean that you throw away 25 years of work.
I'm curious why you think the current lineup is of "questionable morality" when they did not change the name. And give an explanation that I cannot use to argue that:
a) Apple should have changed their name when Steve Jobs passed away
b) Stratovarius should have changed their name when Lassila was fired
c) Hewlett-Packard should have changed their name when they stopped selling consumer devices
d) NASA should change their name when its Space Shuttle program was terminated in 2011
Never. I didn't mean to kick you. I meant that is (in my opinion) a waste of time to enter to a forum from band that I'm not interested in. But well, maybe you stil interested in some way.valo_666 wrote: so don't try to kick me out of here, my friend
This....they are using THEIR name, their trademark, their style, their skill, their talent to create music instead of creating one of the most stupid, fool, maniac and degenerate behaviours ever created.
The band does not need to justify keeping their name anymore than you need to justify not changing your name to Frank or Billy-Bob randomly one morning. If you believe they need to change their name, you must provide a compelling reason.valo_666 wrote:By naming these options it's obvious that you agree with me that the use of Stratovarius name is based on the trademark advantages. Stratovarius should mean something more than a money making enterprise...AAAAAAAAAA wrote:Well, you wrote that they should split and that the current lineup is of "questionable morality". So crime against humanity was, you know, an embellishment to make a point.valo_666 wrote: I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?
Well, even if it isn't throwing away 25 years of work, it is still (by your own admission) making it harder to get gigs and release albums...look what happened to RR.I don't think that being honest to yourself and trying not to live from your past and step forward to other projects that don't involve such situations of questionable morality do not certainly mean that you throw away 25 years of work.
I'm curious why you think the current lineup is of "questionable morality" when they did not change the name. And give an explanation that I cannot use to argue that:
a) Apple should have changed their name when Steve Jobs passed away
b) Stratovarius should have changed their name when Lassila was fired
c) Hewlett-Packard should have changed their name when they stopped selling consumer devices
d) NASA should change their name when its Space Shuttle program was terminated in 2011
Congratulations!!! Finally someone that talks about the real topic that i created after that discussion above...RckteerGZ wrote:Alex Landenburg i'm quite confident he's going to be the on.
i mean, Peter could really do the job, since he already played power metal in the past with Time Requiem (Richard Andersson's band/project)but i don't see him right now in these horizons, Peter's more oriented to Darkane/Labrie's stuff now
it's still unclear in my point of view at least, could be even something really unexpected, like a new talent!
I already apologized for the way I replied the first time. I'm not your girlfriend to say what you want to read, thoughNahu9keys wrote:Congratulations!!! Finally someone that talks about the real topic that i created after that discussion above...RckteerGZ wrote:Alex Landenburg i'm quite confident he's going to be the on.
i mean, Peter could really do the job, since he already played power metal in the past with Time Requiem (Richard Andersson's band/project)but i don't see him right now in these horizons, Peter's more oriented to Darkane/Labrie's stuff now
it's still unclear in my point of view at least, could be even something really unexpected, like a new talent!
valo_666, you make me laugh!! hahaha Please, don't "victimize" yourself, and if you really want to say your opinion, you're the first that have to learn to RESPECT....
"Too much drummer for an already cadaveric band" mmm... I don't like that phrase, i would prefered if you said something like "In my opinion Peter Wildoer is too much for Stratovarius, maybe they could search another drummer". But no, you started that in a bad way. And please, if anyone wants to write in this topic, please try at least to answer to the question "Peter Wildoer?" and not to write things that for sure will generate a great debate, in a wrong place...
PS: I'm scared, i think i'm going nechrophilic... i'm in love with 5 (4 at least) dead guys that make amazing music!
That is your truth against mine, I think they should not have continued. Problem?AAAAAAAAAA wrote:The band does not need to justify keeping their name anymore than you need to justify not changing your name to Frank or Billy-Bob randomly one morning. If you believe they need to change their name, you must provide a compelling reason.valo_666 wrote:By naming these options it's obvious that you agree with me that the use of Stratovarius name is based on the trademark advantages. Stratovarius should mean something more than a money making enterprise...AAAAAAAAAA wrote:Well, you wrote that they should split and that the current lineup is of "questionable morality". So crime against humanity was, you know, an embellishment to make a point.valo_666 wrote: I'm not claiming it to be a crime against humanity, where did I say that?
Well, even if it isn't throwing away 25 years of work, it is still (by your own admission) making it harder to get gigs and release albums...look what happened to RR.I don't think that being honest to yourself and trying not to live from your past and step forward to other projects that don't involve such situations of questionable morality do not certainly mean that you throw away 25 years of work.
I'm curious why you think the current lineup is of "questionable morality" when they did not change the name. And give an explanation that I cannot use to argue that:
a) Apple should have changed their name when Steve Jobs passed away
b) Stratovarius should have changed their name when Lassila was fired
c) Hewlett-Packard should have changed their name when they stopped selling consumer devices
d) NASA should change their name when its Space Shuttle program was terminated in 2011
Since your sole argument hinges on some jibberish about immorality and money, you have no basis and are just repeating propaganda you heard from your friendly neighborhood "spiritual love guru".
I agree that money should not be the sole motivating factor for an artist. But that doesn't mean one should swerve to avoid it, like a pile of deer dung on an interstate.
Here is a picture of some poop on a road, just in case it strengthens my argument.
If you refuse to explain, then yes.valo_666 wrote: That is your truth against mine, I think they should not have continued. Problem?
Nahu9keys wrote:if anyone wants to write in this topic, please try at least to answer to the question "Peter Wildoer?" and not to write things that for sure will generate a great debate, in a wrong place...
I think the 100000000 reasons are pretty much the point.adrian9 wrote:I think valo666 have a hard time accepting what happened to our favorite band, yes I miss the old days too (episode - black album) very very bad, and you can find 100000000 reasons why this stratovarius is not the band we feel in love with but the fact is that the guys moved on and we should too.
bummer dude.
Hated band? Tolkki lover? I'm still here because this is supposed to be an Stratovarius related community and not a what-remains-of-stratovarius praising place, or is it? I don't hate Stratovarius nor love mr. Tolkki, I just explained the things as I see them. If you don't like, deal with it! Thanks for the advice, which by the way, I didn't ask for.GAGAGO wrote:Well said!
There is one thing I can not understand! Why is this Tolkki-lover still here at this hated bands homepage. Why is he not at some page where he can sing Tolkki-praise all day long. So I will advice him to leave here as soon as possible. Or even better if he had done so looong ago!
You didn't explain anything. You just stated that Stratovarius should have split and that the current lineup is of questionable morality.valo_666 wrote:I just explained the things as I see them.
hold on there son, timo tolkki gave matias a band to join on. so ...its very easy make wood out of a fallen tree...RckteerGZ wrote:personally, i'm really glad Matias joined the band, and got off that fat son of a bitch called Timo Tolkki.