browneyedgirl wrote:But, didn't the controversy start before Jari Jokinen got involved?
When it was discovered a person nicked "vitunpuupaa" uploaded songs from the ALBUM to piratebay torrent site&it was discovered who this "vitunpuupaa" really was?
Also, its not a matter of people not having nothing to do. Its simply going to forums&topics are posted there, and people respond to them.
When anyone is well known they can become a target of others hate. Look at the world of politics. For example, I feel so sorry for Hillary Clinton. Recently she had her face doctored onto porno images&they were plastered on various right-wing conspiracy sites. All's fair, people seem to think.
Yep. Post #1 is quite general about the product, the writer wonders if there will be any hard copies available etc.
Post #2 is about Tolkki maybe trying out something like Radiohead.
In post #3 the writer thinks the whole master theft was a swindle. (It was reported in Finnish tabloids). Translation:
"Stealing the master of whole record is so good promoing again. Thief just happens to conveniently steal the master, after which Tolkki shouts out loud in tabloids that "hopefully the thief doesn't understand that it's the album's master". After that Tolkki starts advertising that the songs are available in torrents."
So, some people had quite strong opinions in that early point too, after media had a small hassle around it.
Few following posters seem to believe the whole theft thing is a scam.
There's also a
quotation from the removed MySpace post (in English)... That post speeds up the suspections.
Post of Jari Jokinen appeared as early as 20th answer - very quickly. 13:58 local time. First 2 posts were posted on Monday 18th, the third and fourth were posted on Tuesday night, and the rest before Jari Jokinen's post from morning to afternoon on Tuesday - after the Jokinen's post the post count flew through the roof. The users were bit aroused by the accusations that they wouldn't be allowed to talk about the rumors. That's what Jokinen basically did in the first post.
This post kind of keelhauled Jokinen's explanations.
This post (mostly in English), was maybe the final knock when thinking about reasons for the conversation other than Jari Jokinen. After that, Jokinen's participance and the fakers' actions inspired the conversation.
Mr. Tolkki, I'd say the imposters are clearly responsible for the replies and comments roused by their actions. Jokinen's post sure did provoke to some filthy messages, but that wouldn't have happened without Jokinen. You can't underestimate his effect. He should be caught and punished. Deceit, illegal threats and identity theft are serious crimes. He's responsible for the whole thing.
And yes, vitunpuupaa's identity "was found out" by the rumors. Someone google searched vitunpuupaa and found out that Tero Tolkki has used that nickname in
yahoo group. In May 2006. (The group was deleted but that page is still in Google's cache, retrieved on Feb 15th)
Since the rumor wasn't corrected, it's only natural it got wild.
But... I'd still say that the thread has been mainly about the rumors. As far as I know, the board does not exist to slander anyone. It's for metal music discussion. Since Mr. Tolkki is quite big part of Finnish metal music, it's quite logical that the users want to discuss Tolkki's solo project too. And rumours about this project are nothing if they are rumors. It's allowed to talk about them. I'd also say that majority of the posters are critical towards the information they get. They didn't believe the rumors right away, but media and Jokinen's actions as a then-believed spokesman of Goldenworks did give reason to believe that there's something in some rumours, at least.