Page 1 of 1

higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:56 pm
by giorgiolinas
hi guys..
this singer is really incredible!!!!
I am not joking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

a world guiness record vocal range

just follow this link

http://www.nicolasedda.com/main_ENG.php

then go to the download section and get the sample of the song "in another life"

listen carefully to the last 15 seconds :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

and also get the file "vocal range game"

by the way the songs he wrote and sings are worth to be listened as well :lol:

I still can't believe it

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:57 pm
by Stealth
Oh yeah, that sounds so natural. :roll: 8)

In any case, I didn't like his singing. And there's no point in going so high just for the sake of going high and showing off. I don't know why a lot of people think that the highest you go, the better you sing (at least technically). Just one example: Roy Khan keeping his voice at a moderate pitch without going too high or too low sings a million times better than this guy.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:20 pm
by Dave
*masturbates*

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:06 pm
by StragOvariuS
Since he doesnt make songs with "life", like Kiske, its cool. The new Kiske album sounds like death...with no life, soul and etc.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:22 pm
by Mormegil
Are you sure the singer made those high voices in the end? It didn't sound too natural to me neither.

But in case it is the singer (which I doubt)... wow! :o

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:56 pm
by Stealth
Well, that's not singing at all. He can't really sing with those low and high tones because they are way too weak! He can only "exhibit" them. And the really high ones sound painful. Hearing them just makes my vocal chords hurt. It doesn't sound healthy.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:32 pm
by stratohawk
I don't like his style either. And IMO he is not actual, at least not for the metal scene anymore. He gave interviews in which he said stupid things about metal. He has nothing to do in this business anymore, and he doesn't want to.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:25 pm
by giorgiolinas
Mormegil wrote:Are you sure the singer made those high voices in the end? It didn't sound too natural to me neither.

But in case it is the singer (which I doubt)... wow! :o
well...I was very skeptical too! I couldn't even imagine such a thing...my post was not a matter of good singing, but what he does is astonishing. He can sing as a bass and as a soprano! In any case you can listen to the songs he wrote. I advice "the sense of time"...you can hear that he is not just showing off!

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:40 pm
by giorgiolinas
Stealth wrote: And there's no point in going so high just for the sake of going high and showing off. I don't know why a lot of people think that the highest you go, the better you sing (at least technically). Just one example: Roy Khan keeping his voice at a moderate pitch without going too high or too low sings a million times better than this guy.
I don't think he is showing off anything! If you can reach high tunes, why shouldn't you sing those notes? It is like you have a guitar and play using only three strings! And he is singing very high only in few moments! By the way, I don't think he can sing because he reaches high tunes, not at all! But in general I like the way he sings. Try to listen to one of the songs that are there (not just the sample)...

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:48 pm
by giorgiolinas
StragOvariuS wrote:Since he doesnt make songs with "life", like Kiske, its cool. The new Kiske album sounds like death...with no life, soul and etc.
with no life???? have you tried to listen to any of those songs....there is a lot of life, soul, feelings! The fact it is not "true fucking heavy metal" (as Eric Adams uses to say) doesn't mean it is bad! the same stands for Kiske...the fact he doesn't make metal anymore doesn't mean he doesn't put all his soul in his music!!!!!

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:52 pm
by giorgiolinas
stratohawk wrote: He gave interviews in which he said stupid things about metal.
stupid things??? he spent years inside that world, quite probably he has very good reasons to say those things!

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:58 pm
by giorgiolinas
Stealth wrote:Well, that's not singing at all. He can't really sing with those low and high tones because they are way too weak! He can only "exhibit" them. And the really high ones sound painful. Hearing them just makes my vocal chords hurt. It doesn't sound healthy.
if you are talking to the file "vocal range game", well, yes, that was just an exhibition (and I honestly I find it sensless)...but it was a game!! If you mean he can't sing, I totally disagree! And again try to listen to the his songs...

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:36 pm
by StragOvariuS
giorgiolinas wrote:
StragOvariuS wrote:Since he doesnt make songs with "life", like Kiske, its cool. The new Kiske album sounds like death...with no life, soul and etc.
with no life???? have you tried to listen to any of those songs....
Yes.
there is a lot of life, soul, feelings! The fact it is not "true fucking heavy metal" (as Eric Adams uses to say) doesn't mean it is bad! the same stands for Kiske...the fact he doesn't make metal anymore doesn't mean he doesn't put all his soul in his music!!!!!
To me its more boring than U2 last album. And fuck off if isnt metal, i do not listen just metal...but for my person, his songs are hollow. my 2 cents.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:02 pm
by giorgiolinas
[quote="StragOvariuS
To me its more boring than U2 last album. And fuck off if isnt metal, i do not listen just metal...but for my person, his songs are hollow. my 2 cents.[/quote]

yes, it TO YOU! It's your own personal opinion...

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:10 pm
by StragOvariuS
giorgiolinas wrote:[quote="StragOvariuS
To me its more boring than U2 last album. And fuck off if isnt metal, i do not listen just metal...but for my person, his songs are hollow. my 2 cents.
yes, it TO YOU! It's your own personal opinion...[/quote]

hahha...it was since the beginning...who is bitching here is YOU!

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:54 pm
by giorgiolinas
StragOvariuS wrote:Since he doesnt make songs with "life", like Kiske, its cool. The new Kiske album sounds like death...with no life, soul and etc.
this is not an opinion! You say it as if it is a fact!!!!!...something taken for granted

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:48 pm
by Beast_Pete
Pentapost FTW!

Use the edit button when replying to multiusers...

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:19 pm
by StragOvariuS
giorgiolinas wrote:
StragOvariuS wrote:Since he doesnt make songs with "life", like Kiske, its cool. The new Kiske album sounds like death...with no life, soul and etc.
this is not an opinion! You say it as if it is a fact!!!!!...something taken for granted
Pal, Fuck you.

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:25 am
by giorgiolinas
StragOvariuS wrote:
Pal, Fuck you.

:shock:
have a nice time!!! :wink:

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:07 am
by Patricia
A polemic comes?

@Giorgiolinas: Well, everyone has his/her opinion. Respect that!

Want you see another singer with high notes? Then take a look at this. :wink:

http://www.adamlopez.com.au/Biography.html

Listen to the audio files and look at the video.

It seems that we have another winner....for guys.
Enjoy!

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:12 pm
by giorgiolinas
Patricia wrote:A polemic comes?

@Giorgiolinas: Well, everyone has his/her opinion. Respect that!
I respect opinions which are worth be be respected. For instance when talking about musical tastes like in this case..
but I can disagree! It's easy to be misunderstood in forum.... :)

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:41 pm
by Stratovarrior
Well....High.......cool but no singing voise.... :wink:

Re: higher tan KISKE, higher than the everest :)

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:06 pm
by Patricia
Of course, some people can't really know how singing works, without knowing about the vocal technique! :wink: