I don't think the person does a good job in making the case for the claims in the article.
Here are some of the elements of the war against Ford (and the rest of the USA heavy manufacturing): enormous taxation nightmarish health care requirements unconscionable union demands backed by the full force of the military of the USA restriction of bank credit government forced design changes, ie: plastic bumpers, but not the good stuff takeover and subversion of the Ford Foundation into the antitheses of The Ford Motor Company destruction of the family of Henry Ford destruction of the dealership network established by Ford installation of an Egyptian as President of Ford whose every move lost money, wrecked the product and helped to ruin the dealer network the forced outsourcing of manufacturing to third world locations the hobbling of the engineering staff of The Ford Motor Company who could, if they were allowed to, build UFO's and cars that never needed any fuel at allS
I wonder the politcal and economic system the writer is thinking of as a solution?
The American people, damnably fat and lazy with all these creature comforts, and bamboozled with negative subliminal programming in the open air mind control arcade cannot now see or understand what is about to happen.
To me this is an ineffective way to communicate.
Think about it and know: Nothing can do as much damage to America, and the American People, as the bankruptcy of The Ford Motor Company. It will be worse for the country than nuclear obliteration. With The Ford Motor Company and other USA heavy industries the country could rebuild. Without them there is no possibility of any recovery from anything.
I don't think the writer is being objective here or supporting the thesis.
To me, the article is unprofessional, unscholarly, illogical, and full of extremism. There are some valid points and some that are over the top speculation and misleading.
