From... what? If I somehow came off as angry, it was not my intention to do so, and I apologize.NeonVomit wrote: Dude, chill out.
It's not a self-contradiction to say that I dislike what I think to be metal and that I enjoy what I don't refer to as metal. All I'm saying is that it's all a matter of one's own opinion. The majority is very rarely the side you - or at least, I - want to be a part of. The majority of people believe yams and sweet potatoes to be the same thing, but that does not make it fact. Much in the same way that the majority of people referring to Stratovarius as metal does not make it fact, nor does my not referring to them as metal mean that their not being metal is a fact. Genres are like the economy: Without the influence of people's opinions fueling them, they don't exist at all. In fact, the scientific definition of music is (in simplest terms, because I can't be assed to type out a lengthy definition) a sequence of tones and other naturally occuring sounds that is pleasurable to the human ear. In this way it can also be argued whether something (as what's likely the most common example, rap) is to be considered music or not at all.NeonVomit wrote:If people call themselves metal and the majority of people are inclined to agree with them, then I think it's safe to say they're metal. Saying you hate metal is again saying you hate something based on its label. Therefore your favourite artists and their fans are essentially insulting themselves? I mean okay you can look at things that way but it's a bit of self contradiction...
The argument is similar to when an artist puts his work on display in a museum. One side will argue that the art is still the individual artist's own commercial property while the other claims that when the artist decided to share it with the world, it became a part society, and thus society's property. It's all a matter of opinion and neither side is a definitive 'right'.