Re: Why do People Hate Jews and Christians?
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:36 am
Right on, smiley-face girl,
I have been saying that all along! 
forum.stratovarius.com
https://forum.stratovarius.com/
We shall ask the Muffin Budda! He says "It'll be blueberry, and it shall be made so."...yes!:) wrote:I just had a brilliant idea, lets change the topic of this thread to "Happy 21st Birthday Smiley Face Girl!" Because it's my birthday tommorow (or today or yesterday depending on when you read this post.)
7/28/1986
Whoot whoot!
Yes.The purpose of internet forum is to have discussions eh. I have never ever claimed to be right or to possess a superior knowledge. I am all about freedom. Of course if and when i feel that religions in generally are harmful, then I will say my opinion. It´s not about who is "right" or "wrong". Things are never black and white.:) wrote:-Bow bow-Martine wrote:You're a real story teller. Should start a new career. Would beat J.K. Rowlings and Harry Potter for sure.Carcass wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You're killing me...
Thank you! thank you! I'll be here all week! hahahahahaha
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And in relation to this "real discussion" that is going on in this topic (mostly TT and BEG) I think arguing what's right and wrong, and what particular view is correct on ANY religion is kind of a never ending debate that there are no set, definate answers for. Unless you were there and know first hand, you'll never be 100% certain what is accurate. I think the best way to go is, believe what you want to believe, as long as it doesn't harm your fellow man, and as long as your actions and words improve the quality of life for you and those around you.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But that's just my opinion.
A religion SHOULD be people who come together sharing a common, or several common beliefs about God, or some sort of superior being. It's just like people who join potato chip clubs. "I'm going to join the potato chip club because i believe potato chips are awesome and i want to hang out with people who share the same belief." People natuarally want to associate with people who share a similar belief structure with them. It's when people turn to violence and attempting to force beliefs on other people that the problem comes.TimoTolkki wrote:Yes.The purpose of internet forum is to have discussions eh. I have never ever claimed to be right or to possess a superior knowledge. I am all about freedom. Of course if and when i feel that religions in generally are harmful, then I will say my opinion. It´s not about who is "right" or "wrong". Things are never black and white.:) wrote:-Bow bow-Martine wrote: You're a real story teller. Should start a new career. Would beat J.K. Rowlings and Harry Potter for sure.
Thank you! thank you! I'll be here all week! hahahahahaha
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And in relation to this "real discussion" that is going on in this topic (mostly TT and BEG) I think arguing what's right and wrong, and what particular view is correct on ANY religion is kind of a never ending debate that there are no set, definate answers for. Unless you were there and know first hand, you'll never be 100% certain what is accurate. I think the best way to go is, believe what you want to believe, as long as it doesn't harm your fellow man, and as long as your actions and words improve the quality of life for you and those around you.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But that's just my opinion.
A big Yngwie fan died and went to heaven. He was walking there and suddenly he heard "Black Star" from somewhere. He went to one angel and asked: "Did Yngwie die, I heard him playing here"?. "No no, Yngwie is alive, not here", the angel aswered. Then the next day the Yngwie fan was walking and now he heard "Heaven Tonight". He rushed to another angel and asked the same question only to hear the same answer. No no, Yngwie is still alive. Next day came and the fan was again walking and now heard "Trilogy Suite". Now he could not take it anymore. He rushed to the first angel and almost shouted:"Yngwie must be dead!! I hear him playing every day here in heaven". The angel responded:" oh no no my son. You have misunderstood. That´s just God, he thinks he´s Yngwie".cliff wrote:In my opinion, there are pros and cons with religions.
Religion can help people who are in despair, for ex : an old man whose wife just passed away. Religion can help this man to survive after the loss of his dear. Some people can find help in work, drugs, alcohol or suicide.
So, if someone decides to get his help from God instead, I don't see how bad it can be!
On the other hand, when you look around, religion is the main source of conflict between men.
Ex, all those Al-Caida fkg fanatics who think that their achievement in life is to sacrifice themselves for "God" and kill innocent people, just because they have a different believe.
Besides, I think the Bible is just a sci-fi novel.
I don't mean that nothing mentionned on it is pure fiction, I just say that no one can be sure at 100% that the facts mentionned in it did happen for real. Some people are so much into religion that they believe everything which is written on the Bible, and blame you if you dare to say the opposite! No one can be 100 % sure of anything, for ex that Jesus was a man. Maybe Jesus was a woman, maybe an animal, or maybe just a spirit.
I am absolutely ok with any religion, as long as the people respect others (including the ones with different believes).
I just hate when the people who are devoted to God, they try to give lessons to non believers, telling that we cannot be happy, that we will end up in Hell and so on. Everybody is free to believe (in) anything they want, as long as they respect others and don't harm anyone!
I personally don't believe in God, but i do believe that there is something above us, I just don't want to give "it" any name or any form.
For ex, how can someone explains the creation of Life, the perfect environnement on Earth for Life (oxygen, light, water...), that the human body is a perfect machine, that we are able to eat, drink, breath, move. That everything a human body needs is around us. Or how the reproduction system is amazingly perfect (that men and women's "body" fit perfectly together). The cycles of life. The change of seasons...
I mean, even with the most-scientific mind and knowledge, it's not possible that all those things happened either "by coincidence", either with "Evolution". There is definitely something (or someone) who helped.
I just think it's stupid to give it a name, and try to explain it just with one book which was written 2000 years ago!
After all, maybe God's real name is Yngwie Malmsteen?
Long and boring post, sorry.
This reminded me of something I read in April:RammaGun wrote: I have this car accident and see me and other people flying around like puppets, so vulnerable, fragile, as the vehicle fall off the road. Then, for some reason I don't think "please God, save me". Instead of that In that very moment I think or feel "men, we are that fragile and in hands of Destiny or Fate that we (mankind) created this God to feel protected".
Then I stopped to believe in God!! I cannot stop to seeing religion as just an invention, but I doubt thet there are a plot to control people. If so, why don't think the same about every other religious, mystical or "new-age" belief ?
I met Marty... he smelled a lot like walrus. As the old story goes... just like a plumber, he likes a tight seal. Har har har:) wrote:I think..... that Hitler was actually a care bear that turned to the dark side of the force when he found out that Darth Borat was his father and his brother. Then he escaped to the mountains of Ethopia to embark on a deep spiritual awakening. When he returned from Ethopia he traveled, on foot, to Istanbul. Taking with him only 2 tissues, a toothpick, a stick of butter, a saftey pin and a twinkie, and was able to make the journey in only 3 days. Once he arrived in Istanbul he changed his name to Marty, and set up a lemonade stand. Where, over the course of 5 years he made his fortune, he sold his lemonade stand for a quarter to an asian gnome that was passing by. Using the Segway he bought in Istanbul, he traversed over a great distance to a cave in south eastern France, where he rallied an army of middle aged walruses and antelope, and declared war on the indigenous migets, who fled to a pirate cove in Whales and were never seen or heard from again.
The End
I also believe that animals go to heaven when they die.
I can't speak for Timo, but I never did. Just the bingo version. I suspect you're more versed in "Das Kapital" than I am in the Bible! I read neither cover-to-cover.miditek wrote:I do understand what you're saying, but have you or Tolkki actually ever read the Bible before? Not what we call "Bible Bingo"- just randomly reading verses, but the entire thing, cover to cover?
Yeah.. actually the countries themselves are heavily secularized, and in a more-than-average secular household in an already secularized country I suppose you can imagine all religions get pretty equal space among the choices (or non-choices as in my case).I also understand that both of you were probably brought up in secular households in your respective countries. There's certainly nothing wrong with that, which probably explains why you view the Bible as the same as you would, let's say, Norse mythology- the whole Odin, Thor, and Loki thing.
It's hard also for anyone to comprehend the scope of destruction that sectarian violence wreaked on Europe the last 1500 years or so without burying yourself in history books. The scope of those disasters makes (for instance) the present sunni/shia conflicts look like a nice little sunday picnic... and it's a past that some would rather just forget...Well, America was founded partially due to what was considered the tyranny of the Anglican (a/k/a Episcopal) church, and many of the original colonists decided to "rough it" over here in what was the wilderness of the New World, rather than continue to be controlled by either Canterbury or for that matter, Rome. So yes, I can completely understand your points above.
I don't know so much about how it is in Russia nowadays, but i know it's better this way than how it was.. at least people are allowed to leave now!I was well aware of the Soviet era propaganda, and we have seen the results of what seven and a half decades did for them. Tens of millions murdered by the state and for the sake of none other than the state itself, and now a state that exists solely for profit- sort of a combination oligarchy and kleptocracy along with a growing dose of Fascism.
Definitely.. some programs were just ridiculously blatant. To the point of being comical, even to a kid. The 70s were definitely the worst.But I had no idea that the kids in Sweden were indoctrinated with the Socialist propaganda, and the things that you've described.
I don't think i ever played it. What's the point of playing monopoly if you can't monopolize things and generally behave like an evil robber baron!?!At that time, I remember that I was rather (pleasantly) surprised that the authorities allowed you guys to even play there. I'm sure that "Kooperativ" probably helped to relieve the overall boredom of the tour bus or airplane!
It's better than that nowadays, that i can say for sure!My father was in St. Petersburg on business (Leningrad) about a year or two after you guys played there, and he said that it was a beautiful, although very dangerous city. His interpreter told him not to leave his hotel room at night, and to not answer the door. He remembers hearing automatic weapons fire all night long in the streets nearby.
It hasn't been only the Church and Communism, there were also the Nazis, and other thuggish monarchies and dictatorships that have plagued Europe for a long time.
Radical islam is not at all entrenched in European power structures though, and I at least think it would be very difficult for it to get a foothold, precisely because of the deep suspiciousness toward radical-anything, be it the radical islamic imperialism of Osama Bin Dustbin, the radical Christian imperialism of emperor Ferdinand I, the radical socialism of Stalin, or the radical nationalism, antisemitism and social darwinism of Hitler... old Adi got the most -isms because he was the worst so far, maybe not percentage wise (killed as percent of the european population) but in absolute numbers he was the worst......... so far.My current concern is that Europe has utterly no will to confront radical Islam before it's too late. All in all, it's my opinion that Communism, Socialism, and Fascism did far more damage to the people of Europe than the church ever could have, and that radical Islam just may be the final nail in the coffin, so to speak. Just my $0.02 though.
Germans have had some REALLY bad experiences with cults... ; ) think of it as an allergic reaction.And then over here in the States, I recently saw an amusing story entitled: "Tom Cruise: Scientology's new Goebbels?"The irony that he is scheduled to being filming "Walkyrie" and starring as Graf von Stauffenberg was not lost on me.
Pretty much mirrors the review of Dennett's "Breaking the Spell" in New York Times, but with a bit more understanding.cliff wrote:Religion can help people who are in despair, for ex : an old man whose wife just passed away. Religion can help this man to survive after the loss of his dear. Some people can find help in work, drugs, alcohol or suicide. So, if someone decides to get his help from God instead, I don't see how bad it can be!
JensJohansson wrote:I met Marty... he smelled a lot like walrus. As the old story goes... just like a plumber, he likes a tight seal. Har har har:) wrote:I think..... that Hitler was actually a care bear that turned to the dark side of the force when he found out that Darth Borat was his father and his brother. Then he escaped to the mountains of Ethopia to embark on a deep spiritual awakening. When he returned from Ethopia he traveled, on foot, to Istanbul. Taking with him only 2 tissues, a toothpick, a stick of butter, a saftey pin and a twinkie, and was able to make the journey in only 3 days. Once he arrived in Istanbul he changed his name to Marty, and set up a lemonade stand. Where, over the course of 5 years he made his fortune, he sold his lemonade stand for a quarter to an asian gnome that was passing by. Using the Segway he bought in Istanbul, he traversed over a great distance to a cave in south eastern France, where he rallied an army of middle aged walruses and antelope, and declared war on the indigenous migets, who fled to a pirate cove in Whales and were never seen or heard from again.
The End
I also believe that animals go to heaven when they die.
Animals have consciousness, so I would agree! But what does the Bible have to say about that?
JensJohansson wrote:This reminded me of something I read in April:RammaGun wrote: I have this car accident and see me and other people flying around like puppets, so vulnerable, fragile, as the vehicle fall off the road. Then, for some reason I don't think "please God, save me". Instead of that In that very moment I think or feel "men, we are that fragile and in hands of Destiny or Fate that we (mankind) created this God to feel protected".
Then I stopped to believe in God!! I cannot stop to seeing religion as just an invention, but I doubt thet there are a plot to control people. If so, why don't think the same about every other religious, mystical or "new-age" belief ?
https://forum.textdrive.com/viewtopic.php?id=15218
I agree with most of what you said, but the last paragraph can be explained as such, the universe, us, everything didn't start out perfect, well, most physical laws/behaviors are pretty much perpetual, just the way things are, but this planet is dumb luck, we humans evolved and adapted to oxygen, to our environment and it took a whole lot of time and many died trying to adapt.cliff wrote: I personally don't believe in God, but i do believe that there is something above us, I just don't want to give "it" any name or any form.
For ex, how can someone explains the creation of Life, the perfect environnement on Earth for Life (oxygen, light, water...), that the human body is a perfect machine, that we are able to eat, drink, breath, move. That everything a human body needs is around us. Or how the reproduction system is amazingly perfect (that men and women's "body" fit perfectly together). The cycles of life. The change of seasons...
I mean, even with the most-scientific mind and knowledge, it's not possible that all those things happened either "by coincidence", either with "Evolution". There is definitely something (or someone) who helped.
I just think it's stupid to give it a name, and try to explain it just with one book which was written 2000 years ago!
After all, maybe God's real name is Yngwie Malmsteen?
Long and boring post, sorry.
Just out of curiosity, jens, do you feel that there is a baseline connection between hitler and the relative shape of bananas?JensJohansson wrote:Pretty much mirrors the review of Dennett's "Breaking the Spell" in New York Times, but with a bit more understanding.cliff wrote:Religion can help people who are in despair, for ex : an old man whose wife just passed away. Religion can help this man to survive after the loss of his dear. Some people can find help in work, drugs, alcohol or suicide. So, if someone decides to get his help from God instead, I don't see how bad it can be!
ny times
or if that link doesnt work (it looks a bit suspcious to me..)
http://www.stratovarius.com/forum/denne ... ltier.html
I think the book is pretty good, by the way.
Yes!! Of course!Just out of curiosity, jens, do you feel that there is a baseline connection between hitler and the relative shape of bananas?
:)JensJohansson wrote:Yes!! Of course!Just out of curiosity, jens, do you feel that there is a baseline connection between hitler and the relative shape of bananas?
<img src="http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpre ... 517_rs.jpg" width=500px>
miditek wrote:I do understand what you're saying, but have you or Tolkki actually ever read the Bible before? Not what we call "Bible Bingo"- just randomly reading verses, but the entire thing, cover to cover?
JensJohansson wrote:I can't speak for Timo, but I never did. Just the bingo version. I suspect you're more versed in "Das Kapital" than I am in the Bible! I read neither cover-to-cover.
I also understand that both of you were probably brought up in secular households in your respective countries. There's certainly nothing wrong with that, which probably explains why you view the Bible as the same as you would, let's say, Norse mythology- the whole Odin, Thor, and Loki thing.
JensJohansson wrote:Yeah.. actually the countries themselves are heavily secularized, and in a more-than-average secular household in an already secularized country I suppose you can imagine all religions get pretty equal space among the choices (or non-choices as in my case).
JensJohansson wrote:I know the usual argument is that atheism or agnosticism or secular humanism or whatever is also a religion, but to me that's like saying that bald is a hair color.
And for some reason, you really don't seem to get quite as excited or irritated when discussing religious concepts as others (both religious and secular) do, and that is a pretty rare thing in this day and age.JensJohansson wrote:I guess the good news is that we agree that most of the gods in the world don't exist. We just disagree about that one God who planted his cross on a bunch of European flags!And at that we might not even disagree that much.
JensJohansson wrote:It's just some of the more political and concrete or literal points of Christianity that I disagree with. Some of the more philosophical aspects I agree with. But I realize that Christianity is a pretty definite set of ideas, and I can't pick and choose ideas and still call myself a Christian. Therefore I can state conclusively that I am not a Christian.
Believe it or not, I learned about the Æsir gods in a Norse literature class at, of all things, a parochial (Anglican) school, no less. I was fascinated with all of the texts that we had to read, and was especially interested in Thor, of course, as well as the epic battle of Ragnarök. I sort of viewed it as Pagan eschatology, if such a thing exists!JensJohansson wrote:Some of the Norse mythology is pretty brilliant! I would much rather hang out with Loki than the arch-angel Gabriel. Even though it probably would cost me dearly, I'd have my hair cut, a bunch of my tools stolen, my food eaten, etc.
Well, America was founded partially due to what was considered the tyranny of the Anglican (a/k/a Episcopal) church, and many of the original colonists decided to "rough it" over here in what was the wilderness of the New World, rather than continue to be controlled by either Canterbury or for that matter, Rome. So yes, I can completely understand your points above.
Absolutely true. Most people either don't know, or they don't care. Two unfortunate situations, in other words. Although I think that the worst violence in Europe was certainly within the past 100 years, and probably had very little to do with religion nearly as much as it did with politics. The Church certainly has had its share of crimes, but as far as scale and capacity, the secularists like Hitler and Stalin certainly stand heads above all the rest.JensJohansson wrote:It's hard also for anyone to comprehend the scope of destruction that sectarian violence wreaked on Europe the last 1500 years or so without burying yourself in history books. The scope of those disasters makes (for instance) the present sunni/shia conflicts look like a nice little sunday picnic... and it's a past that some would rather just forget...
I think that you are probably right about this, although I do think that the Founding Father's original intent was the freedom to worship as they chose to do so. Nowadays, that has been misinterpreted as a guarantee of "freedom from religion" by a very loud, obnoxious, and vocal minority here. No one is dragging people to the church (or for that matter, the dunking plank or the gallows a la the Salem Witch Trials), but to hear some people talk, they think that all religions should be completely abolished.JensJohansson wrote:So people really are suspicious for a reason.. and I think the framers of the US constitution were very determined not to repeat the mistake of having any sort of "state church".
I was well aware of the Soviet era propaganda, and we have seen the results of what seven and a half decades did for them. Tens of millions murdered by the state and for the sake of none other than the state itself, and now a state that exists solely for profit- sort of a combination oligarchy and kleptocracy along with a growing dose of Fascism.
JensJohansson wrote:I don't know so much about how it is in Russia nowadays, but i know it's better this way than how it was.. at least people are allowed to leave now!
But I had no idea that the kids in Sweden were indoctrinated with the Socialist propaganda, and the things that you've described.
Did you find yourself laughing at the said programs, or did you simply try to ignore them? Also, was there eventually a backlash among the Swedish voters because of this, or did the programs just eventually fall out of favor or become obsolete?JensJohansson wrote:Definitely.. some programs were just ridiculously blatant. To the point of being comical, even to a kid. The 70s were definitely the worst.
At that time, I remember that I was rather (pleasantly) surprised that the authorities allowed you guys to even play there. I'm sure that "Kooperativ" probably helped to relieve the overall boredom of the tour bus or airplane!
By the way, who is your all time favorite robber baron? Murdoch? Gates? Trump? Branson?JensJohansson wrote:I don't think i ever played it. What's the point of playing monopoly if you can't monopolize things and generally behave like an evil robber baron!?!
My father was in St. Petersburg on business (Leningrad) about a year or two after you guys played there, and he said that it was a beautiful, although very dangerous city. His interpreter told him not to leave his hotel room at night, and to not answer the door. He remembers hearing automatic weapons fire all night long in the streets nearby.
JensJohansson wrote:It's better than that nowadays, that i can say for sure!
It hasn't been only the Church and Communism, there were also the Nazis, and other thuggish monarchies and dictatorships that have plagued Europe for a long time.
JensJohansson wrote:Between say 800 AD and mid 1800s the dictatorships (kingdoms, or whatever they may have been called) were heavily interdependent with Christianity. It's only the last 150 years that the "preaching class" lost their grip on politics. Usually the monarch was said to rule with divine authority, and that was that.
My current concern is that Europe has utterly no will to confront radical Islam before it's too late. All in all, it's my opinion that Communism, Socialism, and Fascism did far more damage to the people of Europe than the church ever could have, and that radical Islam just may be the final nail in the coffin, so to speak. Just my $0.02 though.
I think that's an accurate assessment- the not currently entrenched in European power structures type of thing. However, I do believe that radical Islam is given far more tolerance than it should- and therein lies the danger.JensJohansson wrote:Radical islam is not at all entrenched in European power structures though, and I at least think it would be very difficult for it to get a foothold, precisely because of the deep suspiciousness toward radical-anything, be it the radical islamic imperialism of Osama Bin Dustbin, the radical Christian imperialism of emperor Ferdinand I, the radical socialism of Stalin, or the radical nationalism, antisemitism and social darwinism of Hitler...
I see that you noted so far twice. I also think that Hitler was the worst so far as well. Hindenburg once said, "That man, for Chancellor? I'll make him Postmaster and he can lick stamps with my head on them, but Chancellor? Never!" although I personally believe that one is coming (in fact, he may already be here) that will make both Stalin and Hitler (combined) look like rank amateurs.JensJohansson wrote:old Adi got the most -isms because he was the worst so far, maybe not percentage wise (killed as percent of the European population) but in absolute numbers he was the worst......... so far.
And then over here in the States, I recently saw an amusing story entitled: "Tom Cruise: Scientology's new Goebbels?"The irony that he is scheduled to being filming "Walkyrie" and starring as Graf von Stauffenberg was not lost on me.
I did read an article that said that the Heer (German army) has stated that they will not assist in the filming of this picture, and that the army will not be used as a vehicle in which to promote a cult like Scientology. So I can see where the allergic reaction analogy could also apply to them as well.JensJohansson wrote:Germans have had some REALLY bad experiences with cults... ; ) think of it as an allergic reaction.
We may have to agree to disagree on that particular talking point, although I do understand what you're getting at.NeonVomit wrote:One might call Hitler and Stalin secularists, but I don't.
I've always viewed Communism and Nazism to be a type of political cult (as they had always preached that this supposed God that did not exist was already dead.) The Germans had their Fuhrer and the Russians had their Vozhd ; in fact I tended to agree with Churchill's assessment that apart from a few economic and financial differences, the worst excesses of both systems were virtually indistinguishable from each other. Both systems were also extremely cruel to the Jews, and both systems are (at least in Europe), kaput.NeonVomit wrote:They simply 'removed' established religion and created their own, with themselves as gods.
I still consider NK to be secular, although respect and reverence for the Boss is certainly advisable if one is concerned about his or her's own well-being.NeonVomit wrote:Contemporary example: North Korea. Kim Il Sung is treated with the same reverence that Christ or Muhammad is. Kim Jong Il is something akin to the Pope. I find North Korea a particularly fascinating example of men establishing themselves as gods and have researched it in depth and it would be almost comical were it not for the immense human suffering occurring there. There's not even the whole 'back then' excuse, it's happening now, in the 21st century. Easily the weirdest place on earth.
The 'opiate' example is probably the most famous of core Marxist theoretical quotes, in addition to the "Workers of the world, unite!" proclamation. However, I can plainly state as a Christian of over thirty four years' experience, 'religion' does not 'control' me. At the core, I'm a stubborn son-of-a-bitch, (wouldn't you agree? I'd bet some real money that Tolkki or Stratohawk would!NeonVomit wrote:'Religion is the opiate of the masses', and a fantastic way to control populations.
I still think that we're basically comparing apples and oranges here. In Communism and Nazism the State takes precedent over the individual...period. The individual is utterly inconsequential. With Christianity, the individual is indeed, indispensable, and the very reason why God even cares. That's a pretty significant difference.NeonVomit wrote:Stalin was perfectly aware of this and used it to the full extent. The USSR had its own Holy Trinity of Leader, State and Party. Nazi Germany was almost the same. Mao's Little Red Book was probably meant to be pretty damn similar to the bible or koran.
I think this link at least explains that the people at absolutetruth.com had a less than absolute sense of when their ISP bill was due??browneyedgirl wrote:This link explains who Cain's wife was&where she was from. Of course, I think most people know the simple answer anyway.
http://www.absolutetruth.com/creation/page16.html
TimoTolkki wrote:Okay Miditek and BEG, who seems to be the Christians here.I would be very curious to hear some answers according to your religion:
Most Christians would almost certainly answer in the affirmative to both.TimoTolkki wrote: 1a) Is the heaven and is there hell?
I think that the following quote sums it up rather simply.TimoTolkki wrote: 1b) Based on what one goes to which if there is?
Being a subjective question, I suppose that really depends on whom you ask. For over 2 billion of the world's people, God and Jesus are essentially (orTimoTolkki wrote: 2a) What is Christianity at the end of the day?
Yes, you are quite correct. As I'm sure that you're well aware, there are many different denominations, which presents a form of 'your mileage may vary', so to speak, but most Christians of all stripes typically agree upon the Holy Trinity, the Birth of the Messiah by the Virgin Mary, and that Christ the Son remains the sole mediator and savior between mankind and God the Father.TimoTolkki wrote: 2b) Isn´t it divided to many sections?
Again, a subjective question that could easily return a veritable multitude of potential answers, and each of them could be potentially right, or potentially wrong- and many would look to their priest, pastor, or friendly neighborhood theologian for the "correct" interpretation, rather than getting on their knees and getting to know God a bit better, by spending more time with Him, and less time on which denomination has God's favor over the other. And with that, many parishioners will completely, and not to mention, unfortunately, miss the point.TimoTolkki wrote: 2c) Doesn´t this mean, that some of them must be false?
Religion is merely mankind's interpretation of the Almighty. The Rev. Peter Lord, an evangelist I once heard, had said; "How we live is who we are as Christians; everything else is merely religious jargon.", and it made perfect sense to me. God Himself, being the Supreme Being needs no religion in and of Himself. In fact, religion is probably one of the most abused words in the English language. Christianity does teach though, as I described earlier, that none may come to God, except through the Son.TimoTolkki wrote: 3a) Is Christianity God´s religion and all the others not?
God condemns homosexuality as "an abomination", but also pretty much classifies it as one of the "sins of the flesh", as it were. Christians are of course, under strict orders from God to avoid not only homosexual activity, but also sexual activity of any form outside of marriage.TimoTolkki wrote: 4) Does Christianity condemn homosexuality?
This is much more of a personal type of belief, and is certainly not monolithic to Christianity itself. One such Christian, let's take Congressional Medal of Honor (our country's highest military award) winner Desmond Doss, who was a medic at Iwo Jima. He was a conscientious objector and refused to carry a weapon- not even a sidearm for personal protection. But he was credited with single handedly saving the lives of over 75 wounded Marines, despite the fact that he himself was wounded several times. After the battle, his superior officers had the troops scour the battlefield and found his blood-soaked Bible. Other Christians have chosen to be combat soldiers, including those that shared PFC Doss's Adventist faith.TimoTolkki wrote: 5) Does Christianity accept military actions even if it means that a lot of innocent civilians could die?
Again, this depends upon whom you ask. As an Evangelical Protestant, I personally consider it to be the veritable and literal Word of God, as well as a road map for this life. In turn, I consider this life to be a sort of terrestrial 'boot camp' that prepares us for eternity. Interpretations of this Book vary widely, of course. For instance, a Catholic might think nothing of having a glass or two of wine (or even scotch) after a long day at the office. On the other hand, a Baptist would be horrified at the notion of getting caught with a drink in their hand, or being spotted inside the liquor store by another fellow parishioner.TimoTolkki wrote: 6) Is the Bible the source and guidebook for Christian religion and it is to be taken literally or to be interpreted?
Of course! Just ask Ted Turner or any other Big Media operative the next time you're in Atlanta!TimoTolkki wrote: 7) Is there such a thing as Christian Dogma?