Re: Recently seen movies
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:29 am
The same to me!GuiHunter wrote:Hope to see 2012!!
The same to me!GuiHunter wrote:Hope to see 2012!!
2 hours of stuff blowing up - this can't be badMorgana wrote:The same to me!GuiHunter wrote:Hope to see 2012!!
Although there are many films talking about the Apocalypse and the end of the world, I have this strange feeling that this one is the exception...Shurik wrote:2 hours of stuff blowing up - this can't be badMorgana wrote:The same to me!GuiHunter wrote:Hope to see 2012!!
I'll watch it tomorrow, we've got tickets.ggonza43 wrote:Although there are many films talking about the Apocalypse and the end of the world, I have this strange feeling that this one is the exception...Shurik wrote:2 hours of stuff blowing up - this can't be badMorgana wrote:The same to me!
Can't wait also!
And what is the problem there?ggonza43 wrote:Lucky you!
Wow, I thought that the opening night is in the same days in different countries... Though for example "New Moon" will begin in the next week here in Russia and in the next year in Germany as I heard...ggonza43 wrote:Jajaja, just saying. Lucky that you could see it tomorrow; I guess here I have to wait like a couple of months or more
We love things that collapse and falls, and stuffs being destroyedShurik wrote:The mumbo jumbo doesn't even matter in his movies. Stuff being spectacularly destroyed is.
What kind of movie was it, a "porn-o"? This is in quite bad taste...Morgana wrote:Fuck fuck fuck, guys, after such movies one feels very hard
Save it for the judgeSorry for my bad English
If such a situation should ever occur, everyone will die - rich or poor. There's no way to design and build such ark ships over a small period of time, it'll take the best and brightest engineers and workers and there's no way to conceal an operation of this magnitude in the Internet age. Sure, rich people might try and build shelters and such, but with 1.5 km-high tsunami waves and Earth crust shifting thousands of kilometers, that wouldn't help much. And even if someone will survive this in his shelter - what next? There's no electricity, fuel and production of any kind and sailing from one continent to another is impossible because the maps are useless.sanichi wrote:2012
I really liked it, splendid pictures and action scenes, the plot is well developed, though a bit exaggerated. And as Morgana said, it shows pretty well how rich and influential people would be preferentially treated over others if such a situtation should ever occur.
Yeah, you're perfectly right, if such a situation ever happened (and there's probably a big emphasis on the if) it's pretty unlikely that anyone would survive at all or that a catastrophe like that could be kept hidden. Reading my post again, I realize that what I wrote is basicly nonsense (I was still tired when I posted this). However, what I was trying to say is that the movie showed quite well the consisting injustice between the privileged and the people living in developing countries, but just in general and not in reference to something like such a natural disaster.Shurik wrote:If such a situation should ever occur, everyone will die - rich or poor. There's no way to design and build such ark ships over a small period of time, it'll take the best and brightest engineers and workers and there's no way to conceal an operation of this magnitude in the Internet age. Sure, rich people might try and build shelters and such, but with 1.5 km-high tsunami waves and Earth crust shifting thousands of kilometers, that wouldn't help much. And even if someone will survive this in his shelter - what next? There's no electricity, fuel and production of any kind and sailing from one continent to another is impossible because the maps are useless.sanichi wrote:2012
I really liked it, splendid pictures and action scenes, the plot is well developed, though a bit exaggerated. And as Morgana said, it shows pretty well how rich and influential people would be preferentially treated over others if such a situtation should ever occur.
"The Knowing" movie was much better in depicting the unavoidable natural disaster.
But again, seeking the logic and common sense in Roland Emerich's movies is like seeking for a deep philosophical meaning in the Tetris game. In both cases - there's no such thing.
Did you really expect anythig different from what you just said? We're talking about Roland Emerich after all.Shurik wrote:2012
The world gets destroyed as a result of some implausible pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo. Everything blows up and goes underground and then gets covered by a 1.5 km-high tsunami waves. Several billion people die and hilarity ensues.
Yep, just like every other Emerich's movie, only with different mumbo-jumbo.
They had a black president?!Lurdi wrote:And if the current president of the USA was not black...would we have a black president in the film?
NO NO NO!!! We'd have one as white as snow!
Wise decision if you're not watching it.NeverendingAbyss wrote:They had a black president?!Lurdi wrote:And if the current president of the USA was not black...would we have a black president in the film?
NO NO NO!!! We'd have one as white as snow!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not watching that film. I'd rather wait for Hammer 8 (Out in February 31st)![]()
I knew exactly what I was going to see and I got exactly what I came for, so no damage done. His disaster movies always have exactly the same stock of characters thrown into exactly the same stock of situations. But the stuff blew up really good and that's what matters in his movies.Ragehead91 wrote:Did you really expect anythig different from what you just said? We're talking about Roland Emerich after all.Shurik wrote:2012
The world gets destroyed as a result of some implausible pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo. Everything blows up and goes underground and then gets covered by a 1.5 km-high tsunami waves. Several billion people die and hilarity ensues.
Yep, just like every other Emerich's movie, only with different mumbo-jumbo.