Nice to hearbrowneyedgirl wrote:@Morgana, it seems you&I like alot of the same movies!



Nice to hearbrowneyedgirl wrote:@Morgana, it seems you&I like alot of the same movies!
It's a lovely movieMorgana wrote:Today I want to advertise another good movie - "El hijo de la novia". Though it's hard to find it in I-net but it deserves your efforts. It's Argentinean movie, and I watched it in original with English subtitles, so I could hear the actor's voices and intonations, it was interesting. The movie is light for watching, you will laugh and cry, it will make you think about different things![]()
Stealth,
Haha you seem to get used to another kind of moviesShurik wrote:I'm trying to watch The New Moon, with rifftrax commentary track of course. It is still painful to watch.
The first Twilight movie with this commentary was one of the best comedies I've ever seenHaha you seem to get used to another kind of movies
You don't have to ask about our opinions on a movie to go and watch it. It depends totally on youMorgana wrote:Hey, Stratoforumers, tell me about that Harry Potter, what is so cool with him, why everybody like him so much? Is it really cool? Should I download a hundred parts about him and watch? It deserves? Share your opinion.
Okay, thanks for your opinionggonza43 wrote:You don't have to ask about our opinions on a movie to go and watch it. It depends totally on you. Personally, at first I didn't like "Harry Potter And The Philosophal Stone", but I decided to give it a second try with "The Chamber Of Secrets", where the story began to seem interesting. Then it came "The Prisoner Of Azkaban", and I have to say if I had to choose between all HP's movies to describe the plot of the whole saga, this would be my choice; such an excellent movie. I strongly recomend to watch that one and the following 2: "The Goblet Of Fire" and "The Order Of The Phoenix"
Unfortunatelly, all the movies are related, so if you want to understand the whole plot I'm afraid you'll have to watch all of them
The society has never lost an interest in vampires. There was this little show called Buffy The Vampire Slayer, which also had a spin-off called Angel (much better than Buffy series, IMO). Now there's an HBO series called True Blood which is also about vampires who are not emo and don't sparkle ...Morgana wrote:BEG, I see that Edward Cullen and Twilight Saga revived the interest of society to vampires and so onOf course it's profitable to shoot films on this theme. It pays
>Implying Twilight "Vampires" aren't sparklefaries.Morgana wrote:BEG, I see that Edward Cullen and Twilight Saga revived the interest of society to vampires and so onOf course it's profitable to shoot films on this theme. It pays
Okay, I seeggonza43 wrote:Thanks God you said it all wasn't about your husband
First of all, try to be happy that a man (well, teen) like me had the time to read your whole statement and understood everything you've said; many would have fallen asleep whithin the first line. And I see your point, but I have to disagree: Always living on a dream is what makes women to start beign feminists, saying that no man is good for any women (not saying you are). Also, generalizing is a way to hurt people who take topics like this too seriously; taking the time to know your partern is what every sinlge couple in this world needs, and with that there's no hot vampire dude that can deal with us
Maybe she wasAAAAAAAAAA wrote: The woman had a voluptuous bosom and made a little too much noise; I frankly would have preferred if she sang some John Cage instead.
Maybe not Angelina, but Jessica Alba. In that case, it would be a WHOLE different thingMorgana wrote:Of course it's for girlsIf Angelina Jolie would play Bella so it could be for men
Haha as you wantggonza43 wrote:Maybe not Angelina, but Jessica Alba. In that case, it would be a WHOLE different thingMorgana wrote:Of course it's for girlsIf Angelina Jolie would play Bella so it could be for men