NeonVomit wrote:I thought you meant that as another hint at European governments supporting Islamic extremism, and not a commentary on London's social issues.
Believe it or not, it was not Americans that actually coined the term "
Londonistan", but it was actually a British author by the name of Melanie Phillips. I am not sure if you have ever heard of that book, but you may want to do a quick browse of it the next time you visit the local bookstore.
Phillips does not claim that European governments were
actively supporting the radical Imams, but that the government was
tolerating far too much more than they should have. At any rate, it is a fascinating essay.
It's important to realize that many Americans feel that we really don't want to have to liberate Europe again for a third time in less than 100 years. You certainly don't have to agree with that assessment, but I believe personally that there is a very real danger, as do many of the conservative elements in Europe.
NeonVomit wrote:Yes, some areas are police no-go, but those areas are mostly populated by the black Caribbean community. I've lived in one of those areas. Immigration is a problem as it is everywhere else in the developed world (not least the US).
Don't you think that it's a bit dangerous to allow such types of areas to even exist- meaning that the police are forbidden from going in there?
NeonVomit wrote:Parts of London under sharia law?! What?! Total, complete, utter rubbish and other people who live in the UK on this forum will back me up on that. That's the first I hear of it, and I live here... that's a pretty flawed analysis to say the very least, whoever told you that is either severely paranoid, a member of the BNP or just plain crazy.
Here is one of many examples of the spectre of Sharia invading British society, and not to mention, countless news clipplings of "honor killings":
Sharia law is spreading as authority wanes
telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/29/nsharia29.xml
Don't you think that this should serve as a warning to all Brits, native born or otherwise? And again, this is merely a single example.
NeonVomit wrote:The Pakistani community is not involved in much crime (not in London at any rate, in Birmingham there are tensions between the Asian and black communities but that's a different story), they've just always been the traditional target for xenophobia (your ex-royal marine friend being a good example). If you actually lived here or indeed ever visited London, you'd know that.
But don't you think that foreigners that move to another country should follow the rules, or simply go back from whence then came? Another thing that I find amazing is that the metro bombings occurred right under the nose of agencies such as Scotland Yard and MI6? If there were a sufficient number of "moderate" Muslims there, then they would put their country first, and pick up the phone and call the police when the see or hear something. I don't believe that there is a lot of that going on; and in my opinion, withholding information about terror plots by a moderate makes that person or person(s) no better than the ones that are actively seeking to cause damage.
NeonVomit wrote:People have not forgotten the 7/7 attacks, believe me. However, people have also moved on. Terrorist attacks of that nature are nothing new to London, we've had the IRA bombing campaigns of the 70's and 80's. There was no backlash against the large Irish community of the city then, much like there hasn't really been a blacklash against the Islamic community. People know that it's the fringe lunatics who believe in such things and not the majority. Londoners are renowned for their stoicism and ability to just get on with life no matter what and aren't about to let terrorists get in the way of everyday life.
What happens if the police don't do enough, the "moderates" turn the other way, and let's say, a 1.0 kiloton (suitcase) nuclear device gets detonated inside London? Do you think that the radicals will even care if other Muslims get killed? Do you not think that al-Qaeda is not actively planning such an incident, and more importantly, that they do not have the capabilities to carry out such attacks?
Food for thought, but I've got to run for now, but can follow back up with you more on this later.