The first shredder ever

Talk about everything else besides Stratovarius here in English. Please try to put more serious topics here, and silly topics in the Spam section.
User avatar
adrian9
Sr. Member
Posts:1741
Joined:Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:45 pm
Location:VENEZUELA!!!
Re: The first shredder ever

Post by adrian9 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:31 pm

icecab21 wrote:paganini is a start.
malmsteen brought the guitar playing to extreme places.
if he is more extreme than blackmore, that is doing a bad job at copying blackmore, as blackmore would be less extreme.


as for the guitars, the two use different guitars
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/sho ... n-scallops
oh my god why you have to be so technical about it!!!, only a purist would spot those differences.
and for the copy not copy, I dont think YJM copied Rithcie, he borrowed (or stole whatever you may prefer) some stuff from blackmore and then put his own tone and dynamics into it.
and holy shit WHO DOESNT DO THAT?!?! ritchie borrowed stuff from someone else,etc etc etcc
A9

User avatar
icecab21
Sr. Member
Posts:3520
Joined:Mon May 19, 2008 8:59 pm

Re: The first shredder ever

Post by icecab21 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:22 pm

rebel is the one saying malmsteen trys to copy richie,as if richie invented western music theory and is the alpha of music. im just saying that i would say malmsteen pushed and evolved on some of what richie did for the evolution of electric guitar playing, rather than that malmsteen tried to play what richie did as richie played it. how loose should the term "copy" be? to me, "copy" is technical. as for the comment of influences, paganini or however it's spelled pushed malmsteen to want to do for guitar what pag did for the violin, something richie did not try to become and critisized malmsteen for.

Post Reply